What Is Citizenship Revocation and Why Can a Government Revoke Citizenship?

Citizenship Revocation, also legally termed denaturalization, is the formal process where a government officially cancels the citizenship status it previously granted to a naturalized individual. This serious legal action is essentially the state taking back the citizenship status based on specific findings of wrongdoing by the applicant. A government primarily revokes citizenship to uphold the integrity of its nationality laws and to maintain national security and public trust in the system. The government views citizenship as a serious privilege, not an absolute, untouchable right, particularly for those who gained it through the process of naturalization.

A government can revoke citizenship if it successfully proves the citizen obtained their status fraudulently by misrepresenting or concealing material facts during their initial application process. For example, if a naturalized citizen failed to disclose a serious criminal conviction or another specific identity they held during the application. Failure to disclose such crucial information is viewed as a clear act of fraud that fundamentally undermines the entire grant of citizenship status. Revocation serves as a powerful legal tool to correct errors made during the naturalization process and to deter any future applicants from attempting to commit deliberate fraud. The state seeks to ensure that all citizens meet the statutory and character requirements precisely at the time they formally apply for the status.

The legal power of revocation is strictly limited to naturalized citizens; a person who acquired citizenship at birth generally cannot have their status revoked by the state. This distinction reflects the different legal foundations of the two forms of citizenship acquisition under the law. Understanding that the government must meet a high burden of proof in these specific cases is absolutely essential. The state must clearly demonstrate that the fraud or misrepresentation was material, meaning it was crucial to the entire decision to grant the citizenship in the first place. You need to know the precise legal basis the government is using to challenge your hard-won status immediately.

How Can Law and Visas Defend You Against Citizenship Revocation Proceedings?

Law and Visas can provide a strong, multi-layered legal defense to protect you against the severe threat of citizenship revocation proceedings by the government authorities. We begin by conducting a thorough, expert review of the government’s entire evidence file and their specific Notice of Intent to Revoke Citizenship (NOIR). We precisely identify the weaknesses and legal inconsistencies in the government’s core allegations of fraud or misrepresentation against you. Our lawyers expertly challenge whether the concealed information was legally material to the original decision to grant your citizenship status.

We prepare a detailed, legally sound response to the NOIR, presenting robust documentary evidence and compelling legal arguments against the government’s position. Our defense often involves gathering crucial evidence from the time of your original application, including old documents, records, and witness testimonies that counter the current allegations. We focus intensely on demonstrating your honesty and good faith throughout the naturalization process, even if minor administrative errors may have occurred years ago. Can an original application error that was not material still lead to a formal revocation of your status? We meticulously challenge the government’s specific claim that you willfully intended to defraud the state when you completed your original forms.

In cases where the government pursues the case in a formal court setting, we provide full litigation support and aggressive representation to fight for your citizenship status. We argue vigorously that the government has failed to meet the high burden of proof required for such a drastic action to be taken against a citizen. Our strategy is to ensure that the government’s evidence is fully discredited, thereby preventing a wrongful denaturalization from occurring in your life. We work to preserve your citizenship status and protect all your constitutional rights as a fully recognized citizen of the country.

What Are the Common Grounds for Citizenship Revocation or Denaturalization?

The common grounds for Citizenship Revocation or Denaturalization typically revolve around specific acts of fraud or concealment committed during the original naturalization application process. The most frequent ground is misrepresentation or concealment of a material fact during the official application, oath ceremony, or during the pre-application interview with the authorities. This includes failing to disclose a prior identity, a previous criminal conviction record, or a major past deportation order from another country. The government must prove that this specific concealed fact was material to the decision, meaning the citizenship would not have been granted if the fact was correctly known.

Another serious ground involves obtaining citizenship by willful misrepresentation, which requires the government to prove the individual deliberately intended to deceive the authorities for a personal gain. This ground goes beyond a simple, minor mistake on a form; it alleges a conscious, deliberate plan to commit fraud against the government. Membership in or affiliation with specific criminal, subversive, or terrorist organizations is also a statutory ground for denaturalization in many countries. This category targets individuals who gained citizenship and subsequently demonstrated an allegiance that is hostile to the nation’s core security interests.

Furthermore, citizenship revocation can be based on the revocation of the original naturalization court order itself due to specific legal errors or defects in the original court process. This is a rarer ground, but it focuses on the legal integrity of the specific formal granting procedure. Is an old, minor misdemeanor conviction considered a material fact that can lead to a formal denaturalization proceeding? Each of these specific grounds requires the government to satisfy a stringent legal standard of proof before any revocation action can be formally finalized against you.

How Does the Citizenship Revocation Process Work in the UK, US, or Nigeria?

The Citizenship Revocation Process in countries like the UK, US, and Nigeria typically follows a formal, structured legal path that begins with official notification to the concerned individual. The process is initiated by the government authority responsible for immigration and nationality matters in that specific country’s jurisdiction. In the US, the Department of Justice, usually through the US Attorney’s Office, initiates the formal proceedings in a federal court setting. In the UK, the Home Secretary makes the decision and issues a Notice of Intention to Revoke (NOIR) based on the relevant statute.

The crucial first step is the government issuing a formal legal notice to the naturalized citizen, clearly stating the specific grounds and the evidence for the impending revocation action. This notice allows the individual a formal opportunity to respond to the allegations and present a robust defense to the authority or the court. In the US, the process is predominantly judicial, meaning the government must formally file a complaint and litigate the case in a federal district court before a final decision. In the UK and Nigeria, the process is often administrative or executive initially, with the possibility of judicial review or appeal afterward.

The individual, usually through their appointed lawyer, must then file a comprehensive legal response within a strict time limit, addressing all the government’s specific allegations and providing their counter-evidence. The government then reviews the entire response before making a final determination on whether to proceed with the legal action or formally withdraw the entire case. Do all three countries require the same high legal standard of proof to formally revoke a citizen’s status? Understanding the specific procedural path—judicial versus administrative—in your country is absolutely necessary for filing the correct and timely legal defense.

Can a Naturalized Citizen Lose Their Citizenship After Many Years?

Yes, a Naturalized Citizen can lose their citizenship status even after residing in the country for many years, provided the government successfully proves the specific legal grounds for the action. The time elapsed since the naturalization date does not automatically provide immunity from a formal revocation action by the authorities. The focus of the entire revocation case remains squarely on the original naturalization process itself, specifically the commission of fraud or deliberate misrepresentation by the applicant at that time. The government must legally prove the naturalization was illegally or fraudulently obtained, regardless of the number of years that have successfully passed since the granting date.

For example, a US citizen who concealed a past war crime history or a major felony conviction during their interview years ago can still face denaturalization today. The lapse of time may make the government’s collection of original evidence more challenging, but it does not legally block the government from initiating the formal action. Evidence of long-term good conduct and community ties can serve as a mitigating factor in a court’s final decision, but it does not completely negate the underlying original fraud. Will the court consider your positive contributions to society over the past twenty years when evaluating the government’s claims? You need a strong legal defense that specifically challenges the government’s proof of material fraud at the specific time your citizenship was originally granted.

What Are the Legal Rights of Individuals Facing Citizenship Revocation?

Individuals facing Citizenship Revocation proceedings retain several crucial legal and procedural rights that ensure the process is fair, just, and fully compliant with the due process of law. They have the fundamental legal right to receive formal, detailed written notice of the government’s specific grounds and the explicit evidence supporting the planned revocation action. This right allows the individual a sufficient opportunity to prepare a comprehensive legal defense against the severe allegations being made by the state.

The individual possesses the absolute right to be represented by a competent legal counsel throughout the entire, often complex, proceedings, whether administrative or judicial. They have the right to present all relevant evidence on their own behalf, including witness testimonies and specific documents, to counter the government’s entire case. In judicial proceedings, the citizen has the essential right to confront and cross-examine any witnesses presented by the government against them. Does the citizen have the right to demand a full public trial by a jury in a denaturalization case? Crucially, the citizen has the legal right to appeal or seek formal judicial review of any adverse final decision that results in the loss of their status.

How Can You Challenge a Notice of Intent to Revoke Citizenship?

You can effectively Challenge a Notice of Intent to Revoke Citizenship (NOIR) by immediately preparing and submitting a detailed, comprehensive, and legally precise written defense to the issuing authority. The challenge must directly address every single specific allegation of fraud or misrepresentation that the government has explicitly detailed in the original NOIR document. Your legal challenge must include compelling documentary evidence that directly refutes the government’s claims about what occurred during the original naturalization process.

The defense should challenge the legal materiality of the concealed information, arguing that the citizenship would have been granted even if the full truth was initially known. Your challenge must also specifically dispute the government’s finding of willful intent, asserting that any error was merely administrative, accidental, or due to a genuine misunderstanding. Should your response include a personal statement detailing your long-term attachment and loyalty to the country? Meeting the strict response deadline provided in the NOIR is absolutely critical, as failure to respond on time can lead to a default decision against your citizenship status.

What Are the Common Allegations That Lead to Citizenship Revocation Cases?

The common allegations that lead to Citizenship Revocation Cases almost exclusively focus on intentional deception and major security concerns arising from a citizen’s past history. One frequent allegation is the concealment of a serious prior criminal record, especially convictions for aggravated felonies or crimes involving moral turpitude, which are strict bars to naturalization. The government often alleges the misrepresentation of identity or travel history, claiming the citizen used a false name or failed to disclose a prior deportation from another country.

A major concern leading to cases is the failure to disclose mandatory affiliation with a terrorist or specific subversive organization that poses a threat to national security interests. Allegations can also center on a fraudulent or sham marriage used to obtain a green card, which then served as the necessary foundation for the subsequent naturalization application. Does failing to pay your taxes years ago lead to a formal allegation of denaturalization fraud? All these serious allegations require the government to successfully prove that the deception was material and intentionally willful for the revocation action to stand up in a court of law.

How Can Lawyers Defend Against Claims of Immigration or Identity Fraud?

Lawyers defend against specific claims of Immigration or Identity Fraud by expertly challenging the government’s evidence regarding the three critical legal elements of a successful revocation case. They challenge the allegation of material misrepresentation, arguing that the concealed fact would not have actually prevented the citizenship grant from the authorities. The defense aims to disprove the required willful intent to defraud, showing that the misstatement was not a deliberate act of deception but a simple, honest mistake.

A key defense strategy is to present newly discovered or exculpatory evidence that clearly contradicts the government’s entire claims about the original application process. The lawyer seeks to establish the citizen’s good faith and credibility by providing a comprehensive, consistent history of legal compliance and honest conduct since the time of naturalization. Can providing a polygraph examination help to defend against the serious claim of willful fraud? Successfully defending against these fraud claims requires a lawyer to master the specific details of the original application, the current law, and the strict legal standard of proof.

What Is the Difference Between Citizenship Revocation and Renunciation?

The key difference between Citizenship Revocation and Renunciation lies in who is formally initiating the entire action and the specific reasons for the change in the citizen’s official status. Citizenship Revocation is an involuntary legal process that is exclusively initiated by the government against a naturalized citizen who has allegedly committed serious fraud or concealed crucial material facts. The status is forcibly taken away from the individual through an adversarial administrative or judicial proceeding against their strong wishes.

Renunciation, by contrast, is a voluntary legal act where a citizen freely chooses and intentionally requests to officially give up or relinquish their existing citizenship status. This process is typically initiated by the citizen at an embassy or consulate, usually after careful legal consultation and a sworn oath of formal renunciation. Does the government automatically approve a citizen’s request to formally renounce their citizenship status? Revocation is a punitive action based on past illegal conduct, while renunciation is a personal choice based on the citizen’s own future wishes and specific international tax or legal planning needs.

How Can Evidence and Documentation Be Used to Defend a Citizenship Revocation Case?

Evidence and Documentation are the single most important tools used to successfully defend a citizenship revocation case against the strong allegations of the government. The defense relies heavily on certified copies of the original naturalization application, supporting documents, and all records from the exact time of the oath ceremony. These documents are used to either prove the information was correctly disclosed or to show that any error was an entirely non-material, simple mistake.

Lawyers use affidavits from material witnesses, such as former spouses, family members, or co-workers, who can clearly corroborate the citizen’s claims of identity and personal history. Expert analysis of the government’s evidence is crucial, challenging the authenticity or interpretation of any documents the government is relying upon in its case. Will providing extensive medical records help to defend against the claim of willful misrepresentation during the application? The documentation must clearly and convincingly disprove the government’s claims of material fraud and establish the citizen’s consistent, long-term good moral character.

What Role Does Good Character Assessment Play in Citizenship Revocation Proceedings?

The Good Character Assessment plays a major role in citizenship revocation proceedings, primarily by informing the court’s ultimate discretionary decision on whether the status should be formally revoked. The government’s claim of fraud often directly attacks the citizen’s original assertion of having good moral character at the time of their application. Evidence of post-naturalization good conduct and long-term positive community engagement can be presented by the defense as a powerful mitigating factor in the case.

While evidence of current good character does not legally negate the underlying fraud if the government successfully proves it, it can influence a judge’s perception of the fairness of the severe penalty. The defense uses this evidence to argue that the purpose of the revocation, which is to protect the integrity of the system, has been outweighed by the extreme hardship of separating the citizen from their life. Is a citizen with a spotless record after naturalization more likely to receive a favorable decision from the judge? The assessment helps the court to balance the original offense with the citizen’s entire life and contribution to the society since that time.

Can Dual Citizens Be Affected by Revocation of One Nationality?

Yes, Dual Citizens can be directly affected by the revocation of one of their nationalities, particularly if the revocation involves the country where they permanently reside or work legally. If the revocation involves the citizenship of their country of residence, the person automatically reverts to a foreign national, immediately losing their right to live and work there freely. This loss of status can trigger immediate deportation proceedings against them, forcing the citizen to leave the country that they believed was fully their home.

The remaining citizenship may not provide the necessary legal protection or automatic right to reside in the country that revoked their status. Furthermore, the official revocation by one country can severely complicate the citizen’s standing with their other country of citizenship, requiring additional legal disclosure and scrutiny. Will the revocation by the US affect the citizen’s ability to maintain their Nigerian passport and nationality? The revocation action carries a serious international stigma that can negatively impact the citizen’s overall international travel and financial standing globally.

What Happens to Family Members if a Person’s Citizenship Is Revoked?

If a person’s Citizenship Is Revoked, the official consequences for their immediate family members can be serious and wide-reaching, depending entirely on their own specific legal status. Family members, such as a spouse or child, who acquired their own immigration status derivatively through the now-revoked citizenship may see their own status placed in serious jeopardy. For example, if a child gained citizenship based on their parent’s naturalization, the child’s status may also be retroactively deemed invalid and potentially revoked.

Spouses or children who were granted green cards based on a direct relationship with the now-denaturalized citizen may have their own lawful permanent resident status challenged by the immigration authorities. This loss of derivative status can lead to the family members being placed into formal removal or deportation proceedings from the country as foreign nationals. Are children who are already adults automatically protected from the consequences of their parent’s revocation? The family members must quickly seek independent legal consultation to assess their own unique status and determine what specific legal actions are necessary to protect their continued right to remain.

How Can You Appeal a Citizenship Revocation Decision?

You can legally Appeal a Citizenship Revocation Decision by following the specific administrative and judicial review procedures clearly established by the relevant government authority in that country. If the revocation decision was issued by an administrative body, the first step is typically filing a formal administrative appeal or internal review with a senior body within the same government department. This appeal must be filed within the strict deadline and must clearly state all the specific legal and factual errors made in the original revocation decision.

If the revocation was issued by a formal court, the appeal must be filed with the appropriate higher appellate court within the strict statutory period for appealing the judgment. The appeal focuses solely on challenging the specific legal errors made by the lower court or the administrative authority, such as misapplication of the law or insufficient evidence. What is the typical time limit for filing a legal appeal against a final denaturalization decision by the court? Successfully appealing the decision requires a lawyer to master the specific procedural rules of the appellate jurisdiction and present a strong, technically correct legal argument.

What Is the Role of Judicial Review in Citizenship Revocation Cases?

Judicial Review plays an absolutely essential role in citizenship revocation cases by providing the necessary legal oversight and constitutional check on the government’s immense power to strip a person of their status. In the United States, judicial review is the primary mechanism since denaturalization must be formally litigated in a federal court from the very beginning of the process. In administrative systems, judicial review is the last line of defense, allowing the citizen to challenge a final adverse administrative decision in an independent court of law.

The reviewing court’s primary role is to ensure that the government’s decision was fully compliant with the law, was factually supported by sufficient evidence, and fully adhered to the principles of legal due process. The court assesses whether the government met the high legal burden of proof required to prove material fraud and willful intent in the case. Can the court substitute its own opinion for the government’s original finding of fact during the review? Judicial review ensures that the government’s power to revoke citizenship is not exercised arbitrarily, capriciously, or unconstitutionally against a naturalized citizen.

What Are the Possible Consequences of Losing Citizenship?

The possible consequences of Losing Citizenship are severe, life-altering, and immediate, impacting almost every aspect of the person’s entire life and future stability. The individual immediately reverts to the status of a foreign national, formally losing all the fundamental rights and privileges that come with legal citizenship. This automatically includes the loss of the right to vote, the right to hold a passport, and the right to freely live and work in the country without any specific restrictions.

The denaturalized individual often faces immediate placement into formal removal proceedings, leading to the possibility of deportation from the country they considered their permanent home. They lose eligibility for certain public benefits and high-level government employment that are strictly reserved only for citizens of the country. Will losing your US citizenship also terminate your right to social security benefits you earned while working there? The entire loss of citizenship status causes severe psychological and emotional distress, leading to a complete disruption of family life and long-term financial stability.

How Can Legal Representation Help Prevent Wrongful Denaturalization?

Legal Representation can significantly help prevent a Wrongful Denaturalization by ensuring the entire legal process is conducted fairly, lawfully, and in full compliance with the strict rules of procedure. A lawyer provides the absolutely necessary legal expertise to correctly interpret the complex and often highly technical statutes of denaturalization law. They meticulously challenge the government’s specific evidence and legal interpretation, using established legal precedents and counter-evidence to build a strong defense.

Lawyers ensure that the government strictly adheres to the high burden of proof required for such a serious action to be taken against an individual’s rights. They provide effective, strong advocacy during all administrative hearings and formal court litigation, protecting the citizen’s constitutional and procedural rights fully. Is it even possible for an unrepresented citizen to successfully defend against the full legal resources of the government? Legal representation equalizes the power imbalance between the government and the individual, making the crucial difference between keeping and losing citizenship status.

What Are the Time Limits and Procedures for Challenging Revocation Decisions?

The Time Limits and Procedures for Challenging Revocation Decisions are highly stringent, inflexible, and critically dependent on whether the decision was administrative or judicial in nature. If the initial adverse decision is a formal Notice of Intent to Revoke (NOIR) from an administrative authority, the citizen usually has a very short, specified period—often 30 to 60 days—to file a comprehensive written response. Failure to meet this strict initial deadline can result in a final decision of revocation by default against the citizen’s status.

If the final revocation decision is issued by a formal court, the citizen must adhere to the specific rules of appellate procedure, filing a notice of appeal within a few weeks of the judgment date. These strict time limits are not easily extended by the court, emphasizing the absolute necessity of taking immediate legal action after receiving any adverse decision. Does the type of original fraud alleged in the case affect the precise time limit for filing an appeal? A lawyer must be consulted immediately upon receiving any formal notice of intended or actual revocation to ensure all mandatory deadlines are fully met.

How Can Law and Visas Provide Expert Legal Defense Against Citizenship Revocation or Denaturalization?

Law and Visas can provide Expert Legal Defense against Citizenship Revocation or Denaturalization through our specialized team experienced in high-stakes nationality law and complex federal litigation. We conduct a rigorous legal audit of your original naturalization file to quickly identify the specific legal weaknesses in the government’s entire case against you. We develop a comprehensive legal strategy that specifically targets the government’s required proof of both materiality and willful intent for the original alleged fraud.

We provide full legal representation throughout the entire process, including the preparation of detailed legal submissions and formal court appearances where necessary. Our lawyers gather and present all necessary exculpatory evidence, including witness testimonies and records, to effectively counter the serious allegations of fraud. We ensure your constitutional right to due process is strictly followed at every single stage of the entire proceeding. Do you understand the severity of facing a permanent loss of status without professional legal defense? We dedicate our full legal resources to preserving your citizenship and protecting your rights as a recognized citizen of the country.

Why Choose Law and Visas – For your – Citizenship Revocation Defense Application

Defending your citizenship status is a fight for your entire future and all your rights as a person. We specialize in legally challenging the government’s severe allegations of fraud or misrepresentation against you. Our lawyers understand the high legal burden of proof the government must satisfy in court. We challenge whether the concealed information was legally material to your original naturalization grant.

• We prepare a strong, detailed response to the formal Notice of Intent to Revoke you received.
• We gather all necessary original documents and counter-evidence from your naturalization time.
• We provide full litigation support and representation against the government’s entire case.

Will you risk the total loss of your citizenship status without professional, specialized legal counsel? We fight intensely to preserve your hard-won status and protect your entire life in this country. Choose us to defend your right to remain a citizen.

Why choose Law and Visas as your Immigration Lawyers

Law and Visas brings focused expertise to your immigration case. We know the Nigerian and international immigration rules completely. Our specialization means you get accurate, current legal advice consistently. We actively protect your rights and your family’s future effectively.

• We have a high success rate with complex visa applications and appeals.
• We provide clear, fixed legal fees so you know your costs upfront immediately.
• We offer specialized support for all detention and removal cases worldwide.

Do you need generic or dedicated legal representation for your family? We deliver tailored, results-driven strategies for all our valued clients. We act as your strong legal shield throughout the entire process. Trust the best firm for your critical immigration matter.

Law and Visas as your Immigration Citizenship Revocation Defense Visa agent in Nigeria

Law and Visas offers specialized legal support far beyond a typical visa agent’s services for your citizenship defense. Visa agents are simply not legally authorized to represent you in a formal court of law against the government. We are specialized lawyers who litigate against the Department of Justice or the Home Office to protect your status. We provide the required legal expertise to challenge the severe allegations of material fraud made against your citizenship.

• We challenge the government’s proof of willful intent in a courtroom setting on your behalf.
• We file all necessary legal motions and briefs to appeal an adverse denaturalization ruling.
• We ensure your constitutional due process rights are fully respected throughout the proceedings.

Can an agent adequately prepare a strong legal defense against a government prosecutor in federal court? You need a lawyer to manage the high-stakes complexity of your entire citizenship revocation case. We focus on preserving your status and securing your permanent right to live here.

Our immigration Lawyer and Consultant for Citizenship Revocation Defense

Olumide Adewumi – Director of Immigration Services

Olumide leads our immigration team. He brings 15 years of service. He focuses on complex cases. He ensures clients receive clear guidance. Olumide excels in Citizenship Revocation Defense work. He simplifies the application process. His experience means successful outcomes for you.

Tayo Mogaji – Head of Immigration Consultancy

Tayo guides clients through immigration paths. She designs custom visa strategies. Tayo understands global immigration rules. She helps clients navigate requirements. Her advice is practical. You get direct, actionable steps.

Ada Cooker – Senior Immigration Lawyer

Ada provides expert legal support. She handles diverse immigration matters. Ada excels in detailed case preparation. She ensures every application is strong. Her focus is your successful visa approval. Ada makes the legal process understandable.

How to start your Immigration Citizenship Revocation Defense

Starting your Immigration Citizenship Revocation Defense with Law and Visas must begin immediately upon receiving any official government notice or paperwork. Time is absolutely critical to preserve your right to challenge the severe action being taken against you.

First, call our specialized defense team to book an urgent, confidential legal consultation with a revocation lawyer. We immediately assess the specific grounds the government is using to challenge your hard-won citizenship status.

Second, provide the lawyer with every document you received from the government, especially the Notice of Intent to Revoke. We need to know the specific allegations of fraud or misrepresentation they are making against your record.

Third, we conduct a legal audit of your entire original naturalization file and then begin preparing your comprehensive legal response defense. We ensure your right to fully challenge the allegations is met before the strict legal deadline expires completely. Do not speak to government investigators without your lawyer present.

Client Testimonial: Citizenship Revocation Defense

I received a frightening formal Notice of Intent to Revoke Citizenship years after my naturalization, based on a decades-old error about a minor, non-material debt I had in the past. The government prosecutor claimed I intentionally committed fraud to obtain my citizenship status. Losing my status meant losing everything: my home, my job, and my family’s entire life here.

I hired Law and Visas for a full legal defense against the government’s powerful denaturalization action. The lawyer immediately took over the entire legal communication with the Department of Justice. They meticulously reviewed my entire original naturalization application and all the government’s specific allegations of fraud against my status.

The firm provided a detailed legal brief that fully and convincingly demonstrated that the old error was a simple, accidental, non-material mistake. They proved I did not have the necessary willful intent to defraud the government, which is the necessary key legal element for revocation. They successfully argued that my long-term good moral character and strong community ties outweighed the government’s serious claim.

The final result was the Department of Justice formally dismissing the entire denaturalization case against me without any further action. My citizenship status was fully preserved, and my family’s life here was saved from immediate disruption and eventual deportation. If your citizenship is challenged, you must have a lawyer from Law and Visas immediately fighting for you.

How do I contact Law and Visas

You can reach Law and Visas through various urgent channels.

Visit Our Office: Our physical address is 123 Obadina Street, Omole Phase 1, Ojodu, Lagos, Nigeria.

Call Us: For immediate assistance, call our phone number: +234 812 550 5986, +234 818 154 7085.

Message Us on WhatsApp: Connect with us via WhatsApp at +44 7861 392567.

Send an Email: For general inquiries, email us at contact@lawandvisas.com.

Our Opening Hours: We are open from 8 am to 5 pm.

Ready to start your application now? Start an Application Now. Need specific advice? Book a Consultation now.

Written by Our Immigration Experts

Bolaji Bello – Immigration Content Specialist

Bolaji Bello, our Immigration Content Specialist, offers sharp insights into immigration policy. He’s an expert on visa routes, simplifying even the most complex legal changes. Bolaji ensures you understand new requirements. His articles give you practical, direct advice, focusing on clear information for clients.

Legal Disclaimer

This information is for general use only. It is not legal advice. Laws change. The content here may not be current. We do not guarantee its accuracy. We are not responsible for any errors. Always speak with an Immigration Advice Service lawyer before you act on any information here.