The hostile environment in immigration policy has caused significant debate and controversy in the UK, since it started, this approach to immigration control has increased considerably. This article explores the origins of the hostile environment, its goals, the various measures it encompasses, and its profound effects on individuals and society.
Understanding the Hostile Environment
Introduced by Home Secretary Theresa May in 2012, the “hostile environment” aimed to deter irregular migration. Despite rebranding as the “compliant environment” in 2017, the core policies have remained unchanged. These policies create a complex system that limits access to essential services like employment, housing, and healthcare, and require citizens to conduct immigration checks in everyday interactions.
Previously, immigration control was managed at UK borders by trained officials. Now, the responsibility has shifted to private citizens and public servants, who must verify immigration status in areas like job applications, rental agreements, and healthcare access. This system has turned every citizen into either a verifier or someone subject to verification, often leading to increased scrutiny based on age, ethnicity, or economic status.
Goals of the Hostile Environment
Theresa May outlined the primary aims of the hostile environment in 2012:
- Discouraging Immigration: To deter people from coming to the UK.
- Preventing Overstaying: To ensure visitors do not overstay their visas.
- Restricting Access: To deny irregular migrants access to essential services.
Mark Harper, the Immigration Minister during the 2014 Immigration Act, worked to limit migrants’ access to public services, reduce immigration appeal, and accelerate the deportation of those without valid visas. He pursued these goals to slash net migration numbers and crack down on irregular migrants by cutting them off from support and treating them as criminals
Origins of the Hostile Environment
The idea of privatized immigration controls dates back to the Immigration Act 1988, which introduced “carriers’ liability,” requiring transport companies to verify passengers’ immigration status or face fines. The Asylum and Immigration Act 1996 expanded these controls by making it a criminal offense to employ individuals without the right to live in the UK.
The Immigration, Asylum, and Nationality Act 2006 introduced civil penalties for employers who failed to check employees’ immigration status. The government significantly increased these penalties in 2014, prompting employers to conduct rigorous immigration status checks in workplaces.
Impact and Implications
The hostile environment affects various aspects of life, from employment to healthcare. However, its effectiveness in reducing net migration is debatable. Voluntary departures have decreased, and there is no clear evidence that the policy achieves its objectives. The Wind Rush scandal exposed the unintended consequences, with lawful residents, especially from ethnic minorities, suffering job losses, homelessness, and health issues. The policy’s implementation has disproportionately affected marginalized communities, raising concerns about discrimination.
Encouraging Voluntary Departures
The policy aimed to encourage irregular migrants to leave voluntarily, but data shows a decline in voluntary departures, questioning its effectiveness.
Denial of Healthcare and Public Services
Restricting access to healthcare and public services has inadvertently affected individuals legally entitled to these services, drawing significant criticism.
Cost Savings and Protection of Public Services
The debate continues whether the hostile environment saves money and protects public services. Some argue it reduces taxpayer burdens, while others believe enforcement and legal costs may outweigh savings.
Discriminatory Effects
The hostile environment’s reliance on immigration status checks can lead to racial profiling and bias, disproportionately targeting certain groups. Consequently, there have been calls for a reassessment of the policy’s impact on marginalized communities.
Unraveling the Hostile Environment
Addressing the hostile environment’s unintended consequences and ethical concerns is complex. Reevaluating its impact on communities, tackling discrimination, and ensuring access to essential services for all residents are crucial steps toward resolving these issues.
Main criticisms of the Hostile Environment Policy
The UK’s Hostile Environment Policy has faced significant criticism since its implementation. Here are the main criticisms:
Discrimination and Racism
- The policy fosters racism and discrimination, particularly targeting people of color and those perceived as “non-citizens.”
- The United Nations Human Rights Council has stated that the policy has fostered xenophobia within the UK.
- The Right to Rent scheme, a key part of the policy, makes it significantly harder for Black, Asian, and ethnic minority individuals, as well as migrants, to secure rental properties compared to white British citizens.
Human Rights and Legal Concerns
- The Equality and Human Rights Commission found that the policy broke equalities law.
- The policy has been described as one of the harshest immigration policies in the history of the United Kingdom.
- It has been criticized for being unclear and has led to many incorrect threats of deportation.
Ineffectiveness
- There is little evidence that the policy achieves its stated aim of reducing illegal immigration or forcing people out of the UK.
- The policy has been found to be ineffective and not providing value for money according to a National Audit Office investigation.
Negative Social Impact
- The policy has contributed to homelessness, destitution, and exploitation of vulnerable individuals.
- It has deterred undocumented migrants from accessing healthcare, reporting crimes, or reporting unsafe working conditions.
- The policy has pushed people into poor quality or even dangerous accommodation.
Collateral Damage
- The policy has affected legal residents and British citizens, particularly those from ethnic minority backgrounds, such as the Windrush generation.
- The policy has also been blamed for worsening the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK by hindering contact tracing and mass testing efforts.
Ethical Concerns
- The policy has faced criticism for making doctors, landlords, teachers, and other public sector workers responsible for immigration checks, eroding trust in public services.
- It has been accused of creating an “illegal underclass” of foreign, primarily ethnic minority workers and families who are also vulnerable to exploitation.
Government Accountability
- The policy has been found to lack sufficient care in its implementation.
- There have been issues with monitoring the overall impact of the policy.
These criticisms highlight the wide-ranging negative impacts of the Hostile Environment Policy on various aspects of society, from human rights and social cohesion to public health and government effectiveness.
In addition, The hostile environment represents a significant shift in UK immigration control, impacting many aspects of individuals’ lives and raising ethical questions. While it aims to deter irregular migration and protect public services, its effectiveness and broader implications remain subjects of ongoing debate and scrutiny. The need for open dialogue, informed policy discussions, and ethical considerations is essential in addressing the complexities of the hostile environment and ensuring a fair and just approach to immigration control.
How Law and Visas Can Help?
At Law and Visas, our team of expert immigration consultants is here to make your travel to the UK straightforward and successful. Whether you’re applying for a Family Visas or a Student Visa, we handle every step—from preparing your application to gathering the required documents.
Our Immigration Consultants and Lawyers ensure that your application meets the highest standards, with no details missed. We’ll also keep you informed throughout the process and coordinate with the immigration office or embassy on your behalf.
Law and Visas have a strong record of helping clients secure the visas/permits they need to visit the UK. You can call us today at +234 812 5505 986 to learn how we can help you.
